An error occurred while fetching folder content.
Paul Russo
authored
"int" so that NULL translates to a constant integral type. The C++ standard has this to say in section 4.10 Pointer conversions [conv.ptr]: A "null pointer constant" is an integral constant expression (5.19) rvalue of integer type that evaluates to zero. This is a problem in a function overloading situation like this: void f(double); void f(char*); int main() { for (int i = 1; i < 10; ++i) { f(i); } } The rule in section 4.10 on null pointer constants and the rules in Chapter 13 Overloading, make f(char*) a non-viable function for overloading purposes because i is not a "integral constant expression". However given: #define POGO 0 then in the same loop a call written: f(POGO); is ambiguous since both of the functions are viable (because POGO is substituted with 0, which is an integral constant expression). In cint "#define int MyType" is implemented as a variable definition using the special type macroInt$. So we need to make that type const so that overloading works correctly. Note that this is all a gross hack to paper over the fact that cint does not have a proper preprocessor. -- Paul Russo and Philippe Canal git-svn-id: http://root.cern.ch/svn/root/trunk@24273 27541ba8-7e3a-0410-8455-c3a389f83636
Name | Last commit | Last update |
---|---|---|
.. |